These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
195 related items for PubMed ID: 7023301
1. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources. Collins MT, Swanson EC. Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods. Izard D, Savage C, Enayeh E, Leclerc H, Troonen H. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae. Swanson EC, Collins MT. J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. O'Hara CM. J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs. Awong-Taylor J, Craven KS, Griffiths L, Bass C, Muscarella M. J Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 104(5):1244-51. PubMed ID: 18028359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin. Kulinich LI, Fish NG, Mazitova OP, Dratvin SA, Birger MO. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987 May; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. Martinez-Urtaza J, Lozano-Leon A, Viña-Feas A, de Novoa J, Garcia-Martin O. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the API 20E system for the identification of gram-negative nonfermenters from animal origin. Devenish JA, Barnum DA. Can J Comp Med; 1982 Jan; 46(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 7042055 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the API 20E system for identification of nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria. Shayegani M, Maupin PS, McGlynn DM. J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):539-45. PubMed ID: 353067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Enterobacteriaceae identification compared by MORLOC (a new system) and API 20E. Branson D. Am J Med Technol; 1976 Aug; 42(8):267-76. PubMed ID: 961710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin. Devenish JA, Barnum DA. Can J Comp Med; 1980 Jul; 44(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 7000321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test]. Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different API systems for identification of porcine Pasteurella multocida isolates. Vera Lizarazo YA, Rodríguez Ferri EF, Gutiérrez Martín CB. Res Vet Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 18343468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the API ZYM system as a means of identifying Haemophilus somnus and related taxa. Groom SC, Hazlett MJ, Little PB. Can J Vet Res; 1986 Apr; 50(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 3530416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Superiority of molecular techniques for identification of gram-negative, oxidase-positive rods, including morphologically nontypical Pseudomonas aeruginosa, from patients with cystic fibrosis. Wellinghausen N, Köthe J, Wirths B, Sigge A, Poppert S. J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 43(8):4070-5. PubMed ID: 16081953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a commercial automated system and software for the identification of veterinary bacterial isolates. Patten VH, Shin SJ, Cole J, Watson CW, Fales WH. J Vet Diagn Invest; 1995 Oct; 7(4):506-8. PubMed ID: 8580173 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems]. Sala A, Dore R, Raffaele L, Cappello P. Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Pseudomonas, Flavobacterium, and Alcaligenes with the API 20 NE system. Peladan F, Monteil H. Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Feb; 36(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3279389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae]. Gregersen T, Persson B, Jensen MM. Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference. Kjaeldgaard P, Nissen B, Lange N, Laursen H. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]