These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 7033100

  • 1. Quantitative, microscopical, computer-aided diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia or carcinoma in individual patients.
    Baak JP, Kurver PH, Overdiep SH, Delemarre JF, Boon ME, Lindeman J, Diegenbach PC.
    Histopathology; 1981 Nov; 5(6):689-95. PubMed ID: 7033100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy--a feasibility study.
    Baak JP, Kurver PH, Diegenbach PC, Delemarre JF, Brekelmans EC, Nieuwlaat JE.
    Histopathology; 1981 Jan; 5(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 7216177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative morphometric and cytophotometric study of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and endometrial carcinoma.
    Norris HJ, Becker RL, Mikel UV.
    Hum Pathol; 1989 Mar; 20(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 2722172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology.
    Baak JP, Kurver PH, Boon ME.
    Pathol Annu; 1982 Mar; 17 Pt 2():287-306. PubMed ID: 7182754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The use and disuse of morphometry in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma.
    Baak JP.
    Pathol Res Pract; 1984 Sep; 179(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 6504767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Cytomorphological criteria of atypical hyperplasia and cancer of the endometrium based on data from a multivariate statistical analysis].
    Agamova KA, Starinskiĭ VV, Gladunova ZD, Sidorova NA, Nevskaia EA, Belous TA, Sokolova NV, Gorbenko KE, Puchkov IuG, Novik VI.
    Vopr Onkol; 1991 Sep; 37(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 2014685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Differential diagnostic cytologic signs of atypical hyperplasia and cancer of the endometrium].
    Iagubov AS, Agamova KA, Starinskiĭ VV, Gladunova ZD, Tikhomirova EE.
    Vopr Onkol; 1989 Sep; 35(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 2665313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Further evaluation of the practical applicability of nuclear morphometry for the prediction of the outcome of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
    Baak JP.
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1986 Mar; 8(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 3954843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Criteria for the cytologic assessment of hyperplasias in endometrial samples obtained by the Endopap Endometrial Sampler.
    Meisels A, Jolicoeur C.
    Acta Cytol; 1985 Mar; 29(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 2408406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hysteroscopic view in atypical endometrial hyperplasias: A correlation with pathologic findings on hysterectomy specimens.
    Garuti G, Mirra M, Luerti M.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 13(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 16825075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Potentials and limits of conventional differential diagnosis of the endometrium].
    Höffken H, Hemmersbach E, Heberling D, Leppien G, Rummel HH.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984 Mar; 106(7):421-30. PubMed ID: 6730764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the endometrium].
    Latin V, Krzisnik Z.
    Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1979 Mar; 19(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 550012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Case of atypical polypoid adenomyoma that possibly underwent a serial progression from endometrial hyperplasia to carcinoma.
    Fukuda M, Sakurai N, Yamamoto Y, Taoka H, Asakawa Y, Kurasaki A, Oharaseki T, Takahashi K, Kubushiro K.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 May; 37(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 21272150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well-differentiated carcinoma.
    Kurman RJ, Norris HJ.
    Cancer; 1982 Jun 15; 49(12):2547-59. PubMed ID: 7074572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Early detection of endometrial carcinoma].
    Soost HJ.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1982 Dec 15; 42(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 6761232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Predicting the outcome of endometrial hyperplasia by quantitative analysis of nuclear features using a linear discriminant function.
    Colgan TJ, Norris HJ, Foster W, Kurman RJ, Fox CH.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1983 Dec 15; 1(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 6885224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Complex endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma in adolescents and young women 15 to 20 years of age. A report of 10 cases.
    Lee KR, Scully RE.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1989 Dec 15; 8(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 2767869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Nuclear morphometry in the determination of the prognosis of marked atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
    Ausems EW, van der Kamp JK, Baak JP.
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 1985 Dec 15; 4(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 4055219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasia.
    Winkler B, Alvarez S, Richart RM, Crum CP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Aug 15; 64(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 6377150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of estrogen-induced hyperplasia to endometrial carcinoma.
    Bhagavan BS, Parmley TH, Rosenshein NB, Jefferys JL, Grisso JA, Stolley PD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jul 15; 64(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6738936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.