These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 7048825

  • 1. Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure.
    Eldrup J, Wied U, Andersen B.
    Acta Chir Scand; 1981; 147(7):501-2. PubMed ID: 7048825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods].
    Priesack W, Troidl H, Kusche J.
    Chirurg; 1985 Mar; 56(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 3886325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure.
    Meiring L, Cilliers K, Barry R, Nel CJ.
    S Afr Med J; 1982 Sep 04; 62(11):371-2. PubMed ID: 7112304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Cutaneous mechanical staplers. Our experience].
    Carcoforo P, Navarra G, Gasbarro V, Occhionorelli S, Fabbri N, Sartori A, Pollinzi V, Sortini A.
    Minerva Chir; 1997 Sep 04; 52(7-8):1009-13. PubMed ID: 9411287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.
    Gatt D, Quick CR, Owen-Smith MS.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Sep 04; 67(5):318-20. PubMed ID: 3901864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.
    Nilsson T, Frimodt-Møller C, Jeppesen N.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1985 Sep 04; 74(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 3893308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical comparison of Michel and Proximate clips used for abdominal wound closure.
    Gallagher P, Freeman JB.
    Can J Surg; 1984 Nov 04; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 6498655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Staples or sutures for mastectomy wounds? A randomised trial.
    Steele RJ, Chetty U, Forrest AP.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1983 Jan 04; 28(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6339713
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Skin closure after infrainguinal bypass surgery: a prospective randomised study.
    Wolterbeek JH, van Leeuwen AA, Breslau PJ.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Apr 04; 23(4):321-4. PubMed ID: 11991693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Staples or sutures for chest and leg wounds following cardiovascular surgery.
    Sanni A, Dunning J.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2007 Apr 04; 6(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 17669827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Haemorrhoidectomy: conventional excision versus resection with the circular stapler. Prospective, randomized study].
    Hasse C, Sitter H, Brune M, Wollenteit I, Lorenz W, Rothmund M.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jul 23; 129(30):1611-7. PubMed ID: 15257499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Detecting the limits of bronchial closure methods in an animal model.
    Tezel C, Urek S, Keles M, Kiral H, Koşar A, Dudu C, Arman B.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr 23; 54(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 16639682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A new device for sutureless skin closure "the zipper".
    Carcoforo P, Jorizzo EF, Maestroni U, Soliani G, Navarra G.
    Ann Ital Chir; 2002 Apr 23; 73(1):75-9; discussion 79-80. PubMed ID: 12148426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar 23; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC, Foresman PA, Bill TJ, Bentrem DJ, Rodeheaver GT, Edlich RF.
    J Appl Biomater; 1994 Mar 23; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Skin suture with skin stapler in general surgery].
    Lugani P, Di Giorgi S, Laura V, Gori A.
    Minerva Chir; 1989 May 15; 44(9):1365-9. PubMed ID: 2668796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children.
    Rebello G, Parikh R, Grottkau B.
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2009 Sep 15; 29(6):626-8. PubMed ID: 19700995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures - design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRCTN24023541].
    Knaebel HP, Koch M, Sauerland S, Diener MK, Büchler MW, Seiler CM, INSECT Study Group of the Study Centre of the German Surgical Society.
    BMC Surg; 2005 Mar 08; 5():3. PubMed ID: 15755324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery.
    Obermair A, Crandon A, Perrin L, Walsh T, Carrazo M, Nicklin J.
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jun 08; 77(6):460-3. PubMed ID: 17501887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.