These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 7048825

  • 21. [The utility of stapler in distal pancreatectomy].
    Zhao YP, Hu Y, Liao Q, Zhang TP, Guo JC, Cong L.
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jan 01; 46(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 18509997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [The use of an automatic stapler in abdominal hysterectomies. Our experience].
    Rosaschino P, Palmerio G, Zambetti E, Gambarini A.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Apr 01; 47(4):143-6. PubMed ID: 7644095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Stapler failure in pharyngeal diverticulectomy: a suggested modification in surgical technique.
    Kubba H, Hussain SS.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Feb 01; 43(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 9560504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Phung D, Abidin MR, Thacker JG, Rodeheaver GT, Westwater JJ, Doctor A, Edlich RF.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1988 Feb 01; 9(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 3192614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Wound management after colon injury: open or closed? A prospective randomized trial.
    Velmahos GC, Vassiliu P, Demetriades D, Chan LS, Murray J, Salim A, Sava J, Katkhouda N, Berne TV.
    Am Surg; 2002 Sep 01; 68(9):795-801. PubMed ID: 12356153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Closure of the skin with cyanoacrylate in surgical wounds after tubal sterilization].
    Gorozpe Calvillo JI, González-Villamil J, Santoyo-Haro S, Castañeda-Vivar JJ.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Feb 01; 65():64-7. PubMed ID: 9102376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Reduction of leg wound infections following coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Mullen JC, Bentley MJ, Mong K, Karmy-Jones R, Lemermeyer G, Gelfand ET, Koshal A, Modry DL, Penkoske PA.
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 Jan 01; 15(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 10024861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.
    Ritchie AJ, Rocke LG.
    Injury; 1989 Jul 01; 20(4):217-8. PubMed ID: 2592097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Tissue adhesives versus conventional skin closure].
    Langørgen J, Williksen JH, Johannesen K, Erichsen HG.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1987 Nov 30; 107(33):2944-5. PubMed ID: 3324385
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Skin staples. A report on a controlled and blind random study comparing two types of skin staples in regard to post-operative effectiveness, patient comfort and fiscal costs.
    NATNEWS; 1985 Jul 30; 22(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 2864635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. New advances in automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Jones KC, Himel HN, Towler MA, Thacker JG, Edlich RF.
    Burns; 1993 Apr 30; 19(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 8471153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Decreasing blood loss in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a prospective randomizes trial using a new stapling device.
    Chang SS, Smith JA, Cookson MS.
    J Urol; 2003 Mar 30; 169(3):951-4. PubMed ID: 12576820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Subcuticular skin closure after inguinal surgery. A controlled trial of polypropylene or polydioxanone.
    Leaper DJ, Benson CE.
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1985 Aug 30; 30(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 3932648
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
    Dodson MK, Magann EF, Sullivan DL, Meeks GR.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan 30; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A simple and safe pancreas transection using a stapling device for a distal pancreatectomy.
    Okano K, Kakinoki K, Yachida S, Izuishi K, Wakabayashi H, Suzuki Y.
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2008 Jan 30; 15(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 18670834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities.
    Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC.
    Endoscopy; 2008 May 30; 40(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 18404600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study.
    Rink AD, Goldschmidt D, Dietrich J, Nagelschmidt M, Vestweber KH.
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Dec 30; 166(12):932-7. PubMed ID: 11152253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
    Chibbaro S, Tacconi L.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Apr 30; 16(4):535-9. PubMed ID: 19231198
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A single blind, prospective, randomized trial comparing n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (Indermil) and sutures for skin closure in hand surgery.
    Sinha S, Naik M, Wright V, Timmons J, Campbell AC.
    J Hand Surg Br; 2001 Jun 30; 26(3):264-5. PubMed ID: 11386782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A new stapler-based full-thickness transgastric access closure: results from an animal pilot trial.
    Magno P, Giday SA, Dray X, Chung SS, Cotton PB, Gostout CJ, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Pasricha PJ, White JJ, Assumpcao L, Marohn MR, Gabrielson KL, Kantsevoy SV.
    Endoscopy; 2007 Oct 30; 39(10):876-80. PubMed ID: 17968803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.