These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 7054135

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2.
    Siegel JH, Kim DO, Molnar CE.
    J Neurophysiol; 1982 Feb; 47(2):303-28. PubMed ID: 7062102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations.
    Kim DO.
    Hear Res; 1980 Jun; 2(3-4):297-317. PubMed ID: 7410234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.
    Cooper NP, Rhode WS.
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jul; 78(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 9242278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Further studies on the mechanics of the cochlear partition in the mustached bat. II. A second cochlear frequency map derived from acoustic distortion products.
    Kössl M, Vater M.
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):78-86. PubMed ID: 8789813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Identification of local and propagating distortion products from cochlear microphonic responses.
    Ronken DA, Eldredge DH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):410-25. PubMed ID: 7288027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios.
    He N, Schmiedt RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3554-65. PubMed ID: 9193044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R, Probst R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK, Jassir D, Stagner BB, Whitehead ML, Lonsbury-Martin BL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T, Nuttall AL, Miller JM.
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec 01; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.
    Brown DJ, Hartsock JJ, Gill RM, Fitzgerald HE, Salt AN.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr 01; 125(4):2129-45. PubMed ID: 19354389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.