These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


207 related items for PubMed ID: 7054937

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the cerebral brainstem in the diagnosis of retrocochlear tumors].
    Morant Ventura A, Orts Alborch M, García Callejo J, Pitarch Rivas MI, Marco Algarra J.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1998; 49(8):603-8. PubMed ID: 9951077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in disorders of the primary sensory ganglion.
    Satya-Murti S, Cacace AT.
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():219-25. PubMed ID: 7054944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Diagnostic significance of electrocochleogram and auditory evoked brainstem response in totally or subtotally deaf patients.
    Ohashi T, Akagi M, Ochi K, Kenmochi M, Kinoshita H, Yoshino K.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1996; 522():11-6. PubMed ID: 8740803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Retrocochlear hearing disorders].
    Lenarz T.
    Ther Umsch; 1993 Sep; 50(9):633-40. PubMed ID: 8273023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A new technique for interpreting the BAER in cochlear disease.
    Tomasulo RA, Peele PB.
    Ann Neurol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 3377442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials for detection of retrocochlear pathology.
    Kinney SE, Nodar RH.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1980 Feb; 89(4 Pt 1):291-5. PubMed ID: 7416677
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effect of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response in tumor and nontumor patients.
    Campbell KC, Abbas PJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Dec; 30(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 3695443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Auditory evoked potentials of brain stem during acoustic and electric stimulation of the guinea pig cochlea].
    Gukovich VA, Chudnovskiĭ SI, Moroz BS, Chaĭka SP, Poliakov AN.
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1985 Dec; (5):63-4. PubMed ID: 4060466
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and neuro-otology.
    Prasher D, Ryan S, Luxon L.
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Dec; 28(4-5):247-54. PubMed ID: 7735153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Assessment of cochlear function with distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in acoustic neuroma].
    Oeken J.
    HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 9081952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.