These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
135 related items for PubMed ID: 7063139
1. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity. Carlier E, Pujol R. Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan 22; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea. Bonfils P, Remond MC, Pujol R. Hear Res; 1987 Jan 22; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of olivocochlear bundle transection on tuning curves and acoustic distortion products. Littman TA, Cullen JK, Bobbin RP. J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct 22; 92(4 Pt 1):1945-52. PubMed ID: 1401539 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE? Moulin A, Collet L, Morgon A. Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Oct 22; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Liberman MC. Hear Res; 1989 Mar 22; 38(1-2):47-56. PubMed ID: 2708159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. Kawase T, Liberman MC. J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec 22; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics. Mountain DC. Science; 1980 Oct 03; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [New data on the physiology of the olivo-cochlear efferent systems]. Bonfils P, Puel JL, Remond MC, Pujol R. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1987 Oct 03; 181(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 2954619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound. Klis JF, Prijs VF, Latour JB, Smoorenburg GF. Hear Res; 1988 Nov 03; 36(2-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 3209489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Latency, threshold and frequency selectivity of the crossed medial cochlear efferent pathways]. Bonfils P, Puel JL, Pujol R. C R Acad Sci III; 1987 Nov 03; 304(17):461-4. PubMed ID: 3109694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials. Salt AN, Vora AR. Audiology; 1990 Nov 03; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Siegel JH, Kim DO. Hear Res; 1982 Feb 03; 6(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 7061350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear potentials in the Bronx waltzer mutant mouse. Bock GR, Yates GK, Deol MS. Neurosci Lett; 1982 Dec 23; 34(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 6298667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved. Puel JL, Rebillard G. J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr 23; 87(4):1630-5. PubMed ID: 2341667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea-pig. Brown MC, Nuttall AL. J Physiol; 1984 Sep 23; 354():625-46. PubMed ID: 6481647 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]