These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Comprehensive evaluation of electrocardiographic methods for detection of myocardial infarction. Ritterman JB, Hossack KF, Green B, Bruce RA. J Electrocardiol; 1982; 15(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 7119637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic accuracy of the conventional 12-lead and the orthogonal Frank-lead electrocardiograms in detection of myocardial infarctions with classifiers using continuous and Bernoulli features. Jain U, Rautaharju PM. J Electrocardiol; 1980 Apr; 13(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 7365357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Value of the automated analysis of the electrocardiogram by the Telemed program (V version)]. Bernard P, Chaitman BR, Scholl JM, Chabot M. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Oct; 74(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 6796019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative accuracy of computerized spatial vectorcardiography and standard electrocardiography for detection of myocardial infarction. Cowan MJ, Bruce RA, Van Winkle D, Davidson L, Killpack A. J Electrocardiol; 1985 Apr; 18(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 3998641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of acute myocardial infarction using the 12-lead ECG plus inverted leads versus the 16-lead ECG (with additional posterior and right-sided chest electrodes). Trägårdh E, Claesson M, Wagner GS, Zhou S, Pahlm O. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2007 Nov 16; 27(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 17944659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]