These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

183 related items for PubMed ID: 7077338

  • 21. The visually evoked potential in retrochiasmatic lesions of the optic pathways: an attempt to interpret the responses obtained by flash pattern stimulation and the results of the calculation of the correlation coefficient between visually evoked potentials.
    Samson-Dollfus D, Parain D, Weber J, Menard JF, Mihout B, Vachon B.
    Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():71-80. PubMed ID: 7054988
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Objective Assessment of Visual Field Defects Caused by Optic Chiasm and Its Posterior Visual Pathway Injury.
    Xiang J, Wang X, Yu LL, Jin KJ, Yang YK.
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Aug 25; 39(4):350-359. PubMed ID: 37859473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects.
    Nelles G, Widman G, de Greiff A, Meistrowitz A, Dimitrova A, Weber J, Forsting M, Esser J, Diener HC.
    Stroke; 2002 May 25; 33(5):1286-93. PubMed ID: 11988605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Amplitude asymmetry of hemifield pattern reversal VEPs in healthy subjects.
    Abe Y, Kuroiwa Y.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 May 25; 77(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1690119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the chiasm.
    Flanagan JG, Harding GF.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Jul 25; 69(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 3168727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Correlation between visual evoked potentials and PET neuro-imaging in subjects with retrochiasmatic lesions.
    Celesia GG.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl; 1987 Jul 25; 39():276-80. PubMed ID: 3498623
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Component analysis of pattern evoked occipital potentials in hemianopic patients.
    Crevits L, van Lith GH.
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1983 Sep 30; 55(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 6641477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Temporal visual field defects are associated with monocular inattention in chiasmal pathology.
    Fledelius HC.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Nov 30; 87(7):769-75. PubMed ID: 18976316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Interpretation of visual field defects respecting the vertical meridian and not related to distinct chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions.
    Shikishima K, Kitahara K, Mizobuchi T, Yoshida M.
    J Clin Neurosci; 2006 Nov 30; 13(9):923-8. PubMed ID: 17085298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.