These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
240 related items for PubMed ID: 7088450
1. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening. Beilby JO, Bourne R, Guillebaud J, Steele ST. Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Acta Cytol; 1986 Jul; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality. Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE. Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr 02; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling. Szarewski A, Cuzick J, Singer A. Acta Cytol; 1991 Apr 02; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. ThinPrep Papanicolaou testing to reduce false-negative cervical cytology. Linder J, Zahniser D. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Feb 02; 122(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 9499356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test]. Broso P, Buffetti G, Sacco A. Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep 02; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The false negative smear: an instrumental error? Rubio CA. Acta Cytol; 1977 Sep 02; 21(4):500-1. PubMed ID: 269598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of four cytologic sampling techniques in a large family planning center. Szarewski A, Curran G, Edwards R, Cuzick J, Kocjan G, Bounds W, Guillebaud J. Acta Cytol; 1993 Sep 02; 37(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 8328239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears. Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Acta Cytol; 1989 Sep 02; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method]. Ivanov S. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007 Sep 02; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical follow-up of cervical sampling with the Ayre spatula and Zelsmyr cytobrush. Crouse BJ, Elliott BA, Nesin N. Arch Fam Med; 1993 Feb 02; 2(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 8275183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling. Stock RJ, Thurmond AI, Passmore A. Acta Cytol; 1988 Feb 02; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]