These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

115 related items for PubMed ID: 7108045

  • 21. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics.
    Stockard JE, Stockard JJ, Westmoreland BF, Corfits JL.
    Arch Neurol; 1979 Dec; 36(13):823-31. PubMed ID: 508145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth, and Amplification in Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Easwar V, Purcell DW, Aiken SJ, Parsa V, Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Dec; 36(6):635-52. PubMed ID: 26226606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Evoked potentials of the brain stem in normal and pathologic conditions: experience with 692 adult subjects].
    Burdo S.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1989 Dec; 9 Suppl 24():1-36. PubMed ID: 2686347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Properties of the brain-stem response slow-wave component.
    Klein AJ.
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1983 Jan; 109(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 6848110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Objective assessment of frequency-specific hearing thresholds in babies.
    Luts H, Desloovere C, Kumar A, Vandermeersch E, Wouters J.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):915-26. PubMed ID: 15183583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Free-field release from masking.
    Saberi K, Dostal L, Sadralodabai T, Bull V, Perrott DR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1355-70. PubMed ID: 1939900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Hearing Loss After Vestibular Implantation in Sand Rats With Normal Hearing.
    Mizrachi A, Hilly O, Raveh E, Attias J, Nageris BI.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Sep; 141(9):840-4. PubMed ID: 26225636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Cross correlation function of BAEP for objective assessment of hearing threshold].
    Chen L, Chen JQ.
    Sheng Li Xue Bao; 1989 Apr; 41(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 2762846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effects of stimulus duration on ABR and behavioral thresholds.
    Gorga MP, Beauchaine KA, Reiland JK, Worthington DW, Javel E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):616-9. PubMed ID: 6481001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA, Arora K.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Aug; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical application of dichotic multiple-stimulus auditory steady-state responses in high-risk newborns and young children.
    Luts H, Desloovere C, Wouters J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Dec; 11(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 16219992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE, Small SA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Dec; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss.
    Borg E, Löfqvist L.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981 Dec; 13():99-101. PubMed ID: 6944785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Feasibility of an objective electrophysiological loudness scaling: a kernel-based novelty detection approach.
    Mariam M, Delb W, Schick B, Strauss DJ.
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jul; 55(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 22592125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Brain stem auditory-evoked responses in the dog.
    Bodenhamer RD, Hunter JF, Luttgen PJ.
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Aug; 46(8):1787-92. PubMed ID: 4037510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evaluation of relationship between hearing threshold and loudness discomfort level in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Shapiro I.
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1979 Feb; 44(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 423553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The normative basis for click and frequency-specific BERA in high-risk infants.
    Hyde ML, Matsumoto N, Alberti PW.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987 Sep; 103(5-6):602-11. PubMed ID: 3618187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Auditory brainstem responses in the normal beagle.
    Venker-van Haagen AJ, Siemelink RJ, Smoorenburg GF.
    Vet Q; 1989 Jul; 11(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 2781703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.