These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 7118733

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates.
    Phillips DP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 3305648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Dynamic range of neural rate responses in the ventral cochlear nucleus of awake cats.
    May BJ, Sachs MB.
    J Neurophysiol; 1992 Nov; 68(5):1589-602. PubMed ID: 1479432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Frequency selectivity in the auditory periphery: similarities between damaged and developing ears.
    Walsh EJ, McGee J.
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990 Nov; 11(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2321707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Neural responses elicited by stimuli associated with masking of low-frequency, monaural tonal signals by noise.
    Langford TL.
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Dec; 50(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 6663340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.
    Cooper NP, Robertson D, Yates GK.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):370-86. PubMed ID: 8395584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Two separate inhibitory mechanisms shape the responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV units to narrowband and wideband stimuli.
    Nelken I, Young ED.
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jun; 71(6):2446-62. PubMed ID: 7931527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.
    Johnson TA, Neely ST, Dierking DM, Hoover BM, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3263-6. PubMed ID: 15658675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Correlates of tone-on-tone masked thresholds in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG, Havey DC.
    Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 13(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 6735935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.
    McKay CM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2209-24. PubMed ID: 22423717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Auditory-nerve correlates of loudness summation with stimulus bandwidth, in normal and pathological cochleae.
    Pickles JO.
    Hear Res; 1983 Nov; 12(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 6643293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Rhythmic discharge properties of caudal cochlear nucleus neurons during postnatal development in cats.
    Walsh EJ, McGee J.
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):233-47. PubMed ID: 2905360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
    Morsnowski A, Charasse B, Collet L, Killian M, Müller-Deile J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006 Nov; 11(6):389-402. PubMed ID: 17008774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.