These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
225 related items for PubMed ID: 7129380
1. Insanity defense debated hotly in wake of verdict in Hinckley trial. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 33(10):863-4. PubMed ID: 7129380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule. Goldstein RL. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989 Oct; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who is culpable? The insanity defense. Carpenter WT. Biol Psychiatry; 1983 Sep; 18(9):947-50. PubMed ID: 6640007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of forensic psychiatry and the insanity defense. Schell-King M, Finneran MR. Perspect Psychiatr Care; 1982 Sep; 20(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 6923186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Forensic psychiatry, its place and its promise. Bromberg W. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993 Sep; 21(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 8054668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prohibiting psychiatric diagnosis in insanity trials. With special reference to John W. Hinckley, Jr. Miller GH. Psychiatry; 1986 May; 49(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 3725993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commentary: 1982 was AAPL's year of living dangerously. Bloom JD, Dick DW. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008 May; 36(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 18583691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]