These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

239 related items for PubMed ID: 7133938

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Familiar size affects the perceived size and distance of real objects even with binocular vision.
    Maltz MV, Stubbs KM, Quinlan DJ, Rzepka AM, Martin JR, Culham JC.
    J Vis; 2021 Sep 01; 21(10):21. PubMed ID: 34581767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of variability in other objects' sizes on the extent to which people rely on retinal image size as a cue for judging distance.
    Sousa R, Smeets JB, Brenner E.
    J Vis; 2012 Sep 11; 12(10):6. PubMed ID: 22976399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The familiar-size cue to distance and stereoscopic depth perception.
    Predebon J.
    Perception; 1993 Sep 11; 22(8):985-95. PubMed ID: 8190600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Spatial judgments of exocentric extents in an open-field situation: familiar versus unfamiliar size.
    Predebon J.
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Oct 11; 50(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 1758767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of distance instructions on size judgments.
    Pasnak R, Tyer ZE, Allen JA.
    Am J Psychol; 1985 Oct 11; 98(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 4037149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age.
    Chevrier J, Delorme A.
    Perception; 1983 Oct 11; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The familiar-size cue to depth under reduced-cue viewing conditions.
    Predebon J, Woolley JS.
    Perception; 1994 Oct 11; 23(11):1301-12. PubMed ID: 7761241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vertical position as a cue to pictorial depth: height in the picture plane versus distance to the horizon.
    Gardner JS, Austerweil JL, Palmer SE.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb 11; 72(2):445-53. PubMed ID: 20139458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The contribution of semantic distance knowledge to size constancy in perception and grasping when visual cues are limited.
    Wang G, Zheng C, Wu X, Deng Z, Sperandio I, Goodale MA, Chen J.
    Neuropsychologia; 2024 Apr 15; 196():108838. PubMed ID: 38401629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Problems in depth perception: perceived size and distance of familiar objects. AM 66-22.
    Gogel WC, Mertens HW.
    AM Rep; 1966 Apr 15; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 5954653
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.