These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

106 related items for PubMed ID: 714320

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. A comparison of the reliability of the estimated date of confinement predicted by crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
    Kopta MM, May RR, Crane JP.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar 01; 145(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 6829631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Sonar fetal cephalometry: comparison of bistable with gray scale and real-time techniques.
    Santos-Ramos R, Duenhoelter JH, Reisch JS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Mar 15; 136(6):805-7. PubMed ID: 7355967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. A comparison of biparietal diameter measurements using a real-time scanner and a conventional scanner equipped with a coded cephalometry system.
    Adam AH, Robinson HP, Fleming JE, Hall AJ.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Jul 15; 85(7):487-91. PubMed ID: 678481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. [Fetal cephalometry:reliability and error sources].
    Duenhoelter JH, Santos-Ramos R, Reisch JS.
    Arch Gynecol; 1979 Jul 20; 228(1-4):170-1. PubMed ID: 485280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Reproducibility of biparietal diameter measurements obtained with a real-time scanner.
    Osinusi BO, Hall AJ, Adam AH, Fleming JE.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1980 Jun 20; 87(6):467-70. PubMed ID: 7397078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Analysis of biparietal diameter as an accurate indicator of gestational age.
    Kurtz AB, Wapner RJ, Kurtz RJ, Dershaw DD, Rubin CS, Cole-Beuglet C, Goldberg BB.
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1980 Aug 20; 8(4):319-26. PubMed ID: 6772680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.