These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Auditory brainstem responses to middle- and low-frequency tone pips. Maurizi M, Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Rosignoli M. Audiology; 1984; 23(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 6704061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The approximation of audiometric thresholds by auditory brain stem responses. McGee TJ, Clemis JD. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7402671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [The latency behavior of early auditory evoked potentials in high frequency hearing loss]. Neuwirth-Riedl K, Swoboda H, Gajsek M, Rasinger GA, Swoboda-Brunner E. Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Sep; 69(9):479-82. PubMed ID: 2242186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds. Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM. Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses relationship to behavioural thresholds in cochlear-impaired adults. Munnerley GM, Greville KA, Purdy SC, Keith WJ. Audiology; 1991 Jun; 30(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 2059167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses. Kileny P. Ear Hear; 1981 Jun; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of audiometric configuration on the auditory brain stem response. Keith WJ, Greville KA. Ear Hear; 1987 Feb; 8(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 3556811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Auditory brainstem responses in children with otitis media with effusion. Fria TJ, Sabo DL. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1980 Feb; 89(3 Pt 2):200-6. PubMed ID: 6778307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Click ABR intensity-latency characteristics in diagnosing conductive and cochlear hearing losses. Steinhoff HJ, Böhnke F, Janssen T. Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1988 Feb; 245(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 3072939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Rare audiometry findings in progressive, monosymptomatic low frequency deafness]. Hoppe U, Rosanowski F, Delb W, Iro H. HNO; 2001 Sep; 49(9):739-43. PubMed ID: 11593776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Correlation of the latency shift and brain stem potentials in basocochlear hearing loss and the time course of the click stimulus-induced evoked wave in the cochlea]. Janssen T, Steinhoff HJ, Böhnke F. Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):379-82. PubMed ID: 2765050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of threshold estimation in infants with hearing loss or normal hearing using auditory steady-state response evoked by narrow band CE-chirps and auditory brainstem response evoked by tone pips. Michel F, Jørgensen KF. Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27715342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. van der Drift JF, Brocaar MP, van Zanten GA. Audiology; 1987 Feb; 26(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3593096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of click polarity on ABR peak latency and morphology in a clinical population. Pijl S. J Otolaryngol; 1987 Mar; 16(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 3599162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response]. Mühlenberg L, Schade G. Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]