These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 7169710

  • 1. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure].
    Manabe K, Kawashima T.
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.
    Allan RW, Matthews TJ.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 1774537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S, Brown BL, Hemmes NS.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb 22; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.
    Powell RW.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul 22; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.
    Rilling M, Caplan HJ.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan 22; 23(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 1167899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contextual determinants of temporal control: Behavioral contrast in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
    da Silva SP, Lattal KA.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb 28; 71(2-3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16364564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
    McSweeney FK, Murphy ES, Kowal BP.
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar 31; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
    Gottlieb DA.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Mar 31; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA, Gleeson S.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan 31; 16(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 2303791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Discrimination between outcomes in instrumental learning: effects of preexposure to the reinforcers.
    Blair CA, Blundell P, Galtress T, Hall G, Killcross S.
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug 31; 56(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 12881161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
    Lindblom LL, Jenkins HM.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr 31; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.