These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 7199591
1. A comparison of triceps skinfold and upper arm circumference measurements taken in standard and supine positions. Jensen TG, Dudrick SJ, Johnston DA. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1981; 5(6):519-21. PubMed ID: 7199591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anthropometric measurements and their interpretation: principles, practices, and problems. Gray GE, Gray LK. J Am Diet Assoc; 1980 Nov; 77(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 6776174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional status. Frisancho AR. Am J Clin Nutr; 1981 Nov; 34(11):2540-5. PubMed ID: 6975564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. UAE population reference standard charts for body mass index and skinfold thickness, at ages 0-18 years. Abdulrazzaq YM, Nagelkerke N, Moussa MA. Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2011 Nov; 62(7):692-702. PubMed ID: 21568821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of arm girth measurements with roentgenogrammetric and caliper measurements of subcutaneous fat at triceps and biceps in adult male volunteers. Singh R. Z Morphol Anthropol; 1967 Nov; 59(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 5607814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring waist circumference in disabled adults. Waninge A, Ligthart KA, Kramer J, Hoeve S, van der Schans CP, Haisma HH. Res Dev Disabil; 2010 Nov; 31(3):839-47. PubMed ID: 20227242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of an anthropometric estimate of the muscle and bone area in a transversal cross-section of the arm. de Koning FL, Binkhorst RA, Kauer JM, Thijssen HO. Int J Sports Med; 1986 Oct; 7(5):246-9. PubMed ID: 3793331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reference values for arm muscle area, arm fat area, subscapular skinfold thickness, and sum of skinfold thicknesses for American adults. Bishop CW. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984 Oct; 8(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 6541716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How valid are our reference standards of nutrition? Thuluvath PJ, Triger DR. Nutrition; 1995 Oct; 11(6):731-3. PubMed ID: 8719130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Body composition assessed on the basis of arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness: a new index validated in children by magnetic resonance imaging. Rolland-Cachera MF, Brambilla P, Manzoni P, Akrout M, Sironi S, Del Maschio A, Chiumello G. Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 65(6):1709-13. PubMed ID: 9174464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of body fat distribution measurements. The ARIC Study baseline cohort results. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ferrario M, Carpenter MA, Chambless LE. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Jul; 19(7):449-57. PubMed ID: 8520633 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of the measurement of the circumference of arm, arm muscle area and skinfold thickness during puberty. Derman O, Yalcin SS, Kanbur NO, Kinik E. Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2002 Jul; 14(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 12467194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Generational changes in the growth of children from Maribor and Slovenia. Bigec M. Coll Antropol; 2013 May; 37 Suppl 2():197-209. PubMed ID: 23914508 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]