These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Changes of glaucomatous field defects. Degree of accuracy of measurements with the automatic perimeter Octopus. Gloor B, Schmied U, Faessler A. Int Ophthalmol; 1980 Dec; 3(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 7012057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)]. Krieglstein GK, Glaab E, Gramer E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term fluctuations versus actual field loss in glaucoma patients. Gloor BP, Vökt BA. Dev Ophthalmol; 1985 Nov; 12():48-69. PubMed ID: 3839760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [What new knowledge has automated perimetry with the Octopus brought on glaucomatous visual field changes?]. Gloor B, Stürmer J, Vökt B. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1984 Apr; 184(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 6727246 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients]. Zulauf M, Fehlmann P, Flammer J. Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What do glaucomatous visual fields really look like in fine-grid computerized profile perimetry? Stürmer J. Dev Ophthalmol; 1985 Aug; 12():1-47. PubMed ID: 3839759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]