These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
172 related items for PubMed ID: 7211326
1. The effect of static middle ear pressures on the hearing threshold. Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. Acta Otolaryngol; 1980; 90(5-6):324-31. PubMed ID: 7211326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability. Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD. Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of static tympanic pressure gradients on hearing sensitivity in normal subjects. Truswell WH, Randolph KJ, Snyder GG. Laryngoscope; 1979 Feb; 89(2 Pt 1):306-10. PubMed ID: 423669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Changes in the auditory threshold for air and bone conduction in relation to middle ear pressure in probands with normal hearing]. Maier W, Ross UH. Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep; 74(9):525-30. PubMed ID: 7495432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Effects of occupational noise exposure on asymmetric hearing loss in automobile manufacturing workers]. Chen YL, Wang X, Liu XX, Han F, Kang N, Hu WJ. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2019 Apr 20; 37(4):260-264. PubMed ID: 31177690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum. Ivarsson A, Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Nilsson P, Bennrup S, Sheppard H. Audiology; 1983 Apr 20; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans. Sun XM. Ear Hear; 2012 Apr 20; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry. Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. Audiology; 1979 Apr 20; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of subtle auditory dysfunctions in young normal-hearing subjects affected by Williams syndrome. Paglialonga A, Barozzi S, Brambilla D, Soi D, Cesarani A, Spreafico E, Tognola G. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov 20; 78(11):1861-5. PubMed ID: 25193583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates. Janssen T, Gehr DD, Klein A, Müller J. J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May 20; 117(5):2969-79. PubMed ID: 15957767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening. Baldwin M, Watkin P. Ear Hear; 2013 May 20; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High-frequency pure-tone audiometry in children: a test-retest reliability study relative to ototoxic criteria. Beahan N, Kei J, Driscoll C, Charles B, Khan A. Ear Hear; 2012 May 20; 33(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 21760512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults. Feeney MP, Keefe DH, Hunter LL, Fitzpatrick DF, Garinis AC, Putterman DB, McMillan GP. Ear Hear; 2017 May 20; 38(3):e142-e160. PubMed ID: 28045835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability of Békésy sweep audiometry recording and effects of the earphone position. Erlandsson B, Håkanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1980 May 20; 366():99-112. PubMed ID: 6255732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) and 40 Hz auditory event related potential (40 Hz AERP) to the diagnosis of occupational noise-induced hearing impairment]. Xia YJ, Hao FT, Wang CY, Li JL, Fu X. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Mar 20; 30(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 22804888 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing. Small SA, Hu N. Ear Hear; 2011 Mar 20; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children. Rahko-Laitila P, Karma P, Laippala P, Salmelin R, Sipilä M, Manninen M, Rahko T. Audiology; 2001 Mar 20; 40(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 11521708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds. Gorga MP, Johnson TA, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Garner CA, Neely ST. Ear Hear; 2006 Feb 20; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Frequency characteristics of sound transmission in middle ears from Norwegian cattle, and the effect of static pressure differences across the tympanic membrane and the footplate. Kringlebotn M. J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar 20; 107(3):1442-50. PubMed ID: 10738799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]