These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 721224

  • 1. Eftects of obstetrical interference on the newborn.
    Sharma U, Idnani N, Saxena S.
    Indian J Pediatr; 1978 May; 45(364):143-53. PubMed ID: 721224
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Fetal injuries in forceps delivery].
    Tallián F, Puskás E, Hernády A, Szegedy L, Tomka I.
    Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung; 1965 May; 6(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 5858775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of the morbidity of midforceps and cesarean delivery.
    Bashore RA, Phillips WH, Brinkman CR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 162(6):1428-34; discussion 1434-5. PubMed ID: 2360575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Midforceps deliveries: long-term outcome of infants.
    Dierker LJ, Rosen MG, Thompson K, Lynn P.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 154(4):764-8. PubMed ID: 2421574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Immediate materno-fetal morbidity in the use of forceps. Comparative study of divergent and crossed forceps].
    Walss Rodríguez RJ, Casillas Cantú A.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 May; 52(325):121-5. PubMed ID: 6489800
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station.
    Muraca GM, Sabr Y, Lisonkova S, Skoll A, Brant R, Cundiff GW, Joseph KS.
    CMAJ; 2017 Jun 05; 189(22):E764-E772. PubMed ID: 28584040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. THE VACUUM-EXTRACTOR. I. INDICATIONS AND RESULTS.
    Malmstroem T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964 Jun 05; 43(S1):9-52. PubMed ID: 14150610
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [A comparison of forceps and vacuum extraction delivery (author's transl)].
    Schaller A, Schramm M.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Feb 08; 86(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 4439937
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Our experience in the use of forceps and vacuum extractor].
    Avezzú G, Giannone R.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1973 Jan 08; 25(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 4696914
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Does the dilemma exist in contemporary operating obstetrics "forceps or cesarean section"?].
    Tsvetkov Ts, Tsvetkov K, Petkova U.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001 Jan 08; 40 Suppl 6():10-2. PubMed ID: 11803873
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Incidence of retinal vascular lesions caused by delivery].
    Zisa F, Capozzi A, Ceccarello PL.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1975 Apr 08; 27(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 1169723
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    Chiswick ML, James DK.
    Br Med J; 1979 Jan 06; 1(6155):7-9. PubMed ID: 760969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.