These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
190 related items for PubMed ID: 721434
1. Medical school admissions: the case for a quota. Geiger HJ, Sidel VW. Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Oct; 8(5):18-20. PubMed ID: 721434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions. Sindler AP. Regulation; 1978 Oct; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions. Marshall B. Regulation; 1978 Oct; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In search of a just outcome. Fitt AB. Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):22-5, 59. PubMed ID: 10236161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bakke v. The University of California. Bonham GW. Change; 1977 Oct; 9(10):18, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10236159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered. Graumann FW, Lippman ME. Hospitals; 1978 Nov 16; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future. Bork RH. Regulation; 1978 Nov 16; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Minority admissions: the increasingly empty promise of affirmative action. Gapen P. New Physician; 1979 Nov 16; 28(7):20-6. PubMed ID: 10243299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bakke v. The University of California. Viewpoint 1: the case for preference. Daniels L, Farmer FE. Change; 1977 Oct 16; 9(10):19, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10236160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The case for minority admissions. Schatzkin A, Yergan J. N Engl J Med; 1977 Sep 08; 297(10):554-6. PubMed ID: 887108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The University of California v. Bakke: reparations are justified for blacks. Jackson J. Regulation; 1978 Sep 08; 2(5):24-9. PubMed ID: 10238566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bakke v. The University of California. Viewpoint 2: the case against preference. Sherman MJ. Change; 1977 Oct 08; 9(10):19, 60-1. PubMed ID: 10323901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethical questions involved in the upcoming Bakke case decision. Bristow LR. Forum Med; 1978 May 08; 1(2):24-5. PubMed ID: 10236756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Backing into Bakke. Health PAC Bull; 1977 Jun 08; (76):4-5. PubMed ID: 10236351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Illegality of decisions based on selection interviews for medical school. Decree of the Baden-Wurttemberg Higher Administrative Court, 26 June 1987]. Rieger HJ. Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1987 Oct 09; 112(41):1592-3. PubMed ID: 3665740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A legal perspective on the Bakke decision. Tallent SE. Pers J; 1979 May 09; 58(5):296-302, 325. PubMed ID: 10241468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compensatory justice in affirmative action. Ghassemian AJ. Curr Surg; 2003 May 09; 60(6):596-7. PubMed ID: 14972198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; policy interpretation--Office for Civil Rights, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Fed Regist; 1979 Oct 10; 44(197):58509-11. PubMed ID: 10244079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Facing an age-old problem. Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Nov 10; 7(11):43-4. PubMed ID: 263198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Affirmative action in medical school admissions. Geiger HJ. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981 Nov 10; 76():39-45. PubMed ID: 7335671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]