These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 7250344

  • 1. How patients view mandatory waiting periods for abortion.
    Lupfer M, Silber BG.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7250344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods: Survey Evidence before Arizona's Two-visit 24-hour Mandatory Waiting Period Law.
    Karasek D, Roberts SC, Weitz TA.
    Womens Health Issues; 2016; 26(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 26626710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.
    Joyce T, Kaestner R.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A technical knockout for parental notification.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 3556537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.
    Haas-Wilson D.
    J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Induced abortion. Epidemiological study after eight years of enforcement of Law 194].
    Danero S, Capitani S, La Rosa R, Morgante G, Marsiglietti C, Turillazzi E, Oliveti C, Ricci MG.
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1987; 15(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 12283378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Psychosocial aspects of women applying for abortion after 12 weeks of pregnancy].
    Nordentoft M, Petersson BH, Sidenius K.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Apr 01; 153(14):995-8. PubMed ID: 2024321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The impact of requirements for parental consent on minors' abortions in Mississippi.
    Henshaw SK.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995 Apr 01; 27(3):120-2. PubMed ID: 7672103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Induced abortion after the 12th week of pregnancy in the county of Arhus 1993-1994. Psychological consequences].
    Meyer L, Petersson BH.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Jul 29; 158(31):4395-8. PubMed ID: 8759996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Safe abortions in an illegal context: perceptions from service providers in Belgium.
    Donnay F, Bregentzer A, Leemans P, Verougstraete A, Vekemans M.
    Stud Fam Plann; 1993 Jul 29; 24(3):150-62. PubMed ID: 8351696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.