These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


188 related items for PubMed ID: 7271591

  • 1. [Rapid derived auditory evoked potentials].
    Conraux C, Dauman R, Feblot P.
    Audiology; 1981; 20(5):382-93. PubMed ID: 7271591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Brain stem evoked response audiometry in neonates.
    Mandal AK, Mehra YN, Narang A, Raghunathan M, Walia BN.
    Indian Pediatr; 1989 Jun; 26(6):566-70. PubMed ID: 2583808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory brainstem response in the cat. Effect of masking level on derived-band contributions.
    Mair IW, Laukli E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987 Jun; 103(5-6):586-92. PubMed ID: 3618185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V, Steinert W.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP.
    Audiology; 1984 Oct; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) in pregnant women.
    Tandon OP, Misra R, Tandon I.
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Jan; 34(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 2361723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditory brainstem responses: masking related changes in wave VI.
    Reid A, Birchall JP, Moffat DA.
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Feb; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 6722368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Surface-recorded auditory brainstem responses in the dog.
    Barry SJ, Barry SD.
    J Aud Res; 1980 Oct; 20(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 7349303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Results of recording frequency-specific acoustically evoked potentials with masked stimuli].
    Schönweiler R, Tolloczko R, Ptok M.
    HNO; 1995 Jun; 43(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 7642399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Derived acoustically evoked brainstem responses by means of narrow-band and notched-noise masking in normal-hearing subjects.
    Thümmler I, Tietze G.
    Scand Audiol; 1984 Jun; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 6463552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P.
    Ear Hear; 1981 Jun; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dipole localization methods (DLM) and auditory evoked brainstem potentials.
    Grandori F.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1984 Jun; 105(2 Suppl):171-8. PubMed ID: 6463439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Auditory screening of high risk infants with brainstem evoked responses and impedance audiometry.
    Crowell DH, Pang-Ching G, Anderson RE, Kapuniai LE, Teruya K, Doo G, Wright P, Stephens JK.
    Hawaii Med J; 1980 Nov; 39(11):277-82. PubMed ID: 7216743
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY, Stapells DR.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.