These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

111 related items for PubMed ID: 7300279

  • 1. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK, Mason D.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
    Carter AS, Noe CM, Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss.
    Gelfand SA, Silman S, Ross L.
    Scand Audiol; 1987 May; 16(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3438702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation.
    Gelfand SA, Hochberg I.
    Audiology; 1976 Jun; 15(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 1252192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN, Pandey PC, Jangamashetti DS.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 8028325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation.
    Hawkins DB, Yacullo WS.
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 6748623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance-intensity functions as a predictor for binaural amplification.
    Mueller HG, Grimes AM, Jerome JJ.
    Ear Hear; 1981 Aug; 2(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 7297786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reverberation as a parameter in clinical testing.
    Nábĕlek AK, Robinette L.
    Audiology; 1978 Aug; 17(3):239-59. PubMed ID: 666659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H, Pickett JM.
    Ear Hear; 1981 Aug; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.