These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

155 related items for PubMed ID: 7326267

  • 1. The effect of stress imagery on arousal and its implications for biofeedback of the frontalis muscles.
    Passchier J, vd Helm-Hylkema H.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Sep; 6(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7326267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. EMG levels in the occipitofrontalis muscles under an experimental stress condition.
    Pritchard DW, Wood MM.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1983 Mar; 8(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 6882813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Strategies of arousal control: biofeedback, meditation, and motivation.
    Cuthbert B, Kristeller J, Simons R, Hodes R, Lang PJ.
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1981 Dec; 110(4):518-46. PubMed ID: 6459406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A multiple-response evaluation of EMG biofeedback performance during training and stress-induction conditions.
    Gatchel RJ, Korman M, Weis CB, Smith D, Clarke L.
    Psychophysiology; 1978 May; 15(3):253-8. PubMed ID: 351661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cognitive skills training versus EMG biofeedback in the treatment of tension headaches.
    Kemsdorf RB, Kochanowicz NA, Costell S.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Mar; 6(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 7260184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of induced frontalis tension variation on aspects of cognitive efficiency.
    Moran CC, Cleary PJ.
    Br J Psychol; 1986 Feb; 77 ( Pt 1)():63-8. PubMed ID: 3955329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The relative effectiveness of three techniques to induce the trophotropic response.
    Fee RA, Girdano DA.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1978 Jun; 3(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 356900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of frontal EMG biofeedback and neck EMG biofeedback in the treatment of muscle-contraction headache.
    Hart JD, Cichanski KA.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Mar; 6(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 7260182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of variation in physical effort on frontalis EMG activity.
    Graham C, Cook MR, Cohen HD, Gerkovich MM, Phelps JW, Fotopoulos SS.
    Biofeedback Self Regul; 1986 Jun; 11(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 3567233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.