These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


762 related items for PubMed ID: 7326654

  • 21. The cesarean delivery rate can be safely reduced in a developing country.
    de Muylder X, Thiery M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):360-4. PubMed ID: 2304708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cesarean section: recent trends.
    Martin MC, Moyyen S, Gelfand M.
    Can J Surg; 1982 Jan; 25(1):85-7, 91. PubMed ID: 7055772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
    Shiono PH, McNellis D, Rhoads GG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The rising cesarean section rate: can it safely be reversed?
    Minkoff HL, Schwarz RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 7393501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Branch DW, Silver RM.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Dec; 55(4):946-60. PubMed ID: 23090464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Epidemiological surveillance and obstetrical dystocias surgery in Senegal].
    Bouillin D, Fournier G, Gueye A, Diadhiou F, Cissé CT.
    Sante; 1994 Dec; 4(6):399-406. PubMed ID: 7850191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.
    Ismail MA, Nagib N, Ismail T, Cibils LA.
    J Perinat Med; 1999 Dec; 27(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 10642954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Pelvic presentation, always cesarean?].
    Neri Ruiz ES, Valerio Castro E, Cárdenas Arias R, Navarro Milla C.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Nov; 65():474-7. PubMed ID: 9441149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries.
    Stanton C, Ronsmans C, Baltimore Group on Cesarean.
    Birth; 2008 Sep; 35(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 18844646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Term-breech presentation: predictive factors of cesarean section for vaginal-birth failure].
    Broche DE, Ramanah R, Collin A, Mangin M, Vidal C, Maillet R, Riethmuller D.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 18584974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Cesarean section in Ontario: practice patterns and responses to hypothetical cases.
    Barnsley JM, Vayda E, Lomas J, Enkin MW, Pierre KD, Anderson GM, MacKinnon BA.
    Can J Surg; 1990 Apr; 33(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 2268812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Incidence of and indications for cesarean sections in the Quebec, Canada region 1973 and 1979].
    Marcoux S, Fabia J.
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1983 Apr; 31(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 6669773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands.
    Schutte JM, Steegers EA, Santema JG, Schuitemaker NW, van Roosmalen J, Maternal Mortality Committee Of The Netherlands Society Of Obstetrics.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Apr; 86(2):240-3. PubMed ID: 17364290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation].
    Vasilj O, Matijević R, Grgić O.
    Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Outcomes associated with cesarean section versus vaginal breech delivery at a university hospital.
    Hopkins LM, Esakoff T, Noah MS, Moore DH, Sawaya GF, Laros RK.
    J Perinatol; 2007 Mar; 27(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 17036031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Indications for cesarean section: final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    CMAJ; 1986 Jun 15; 134(12):1348-52. PubMed ID: 3708486
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Neonatal performance of the selected term vaginal breech delivery.
    Gimovsky ML, Petrie RH, Todd WD.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Dec 15; 56(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 7443110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Cesarean section: a contemporary assessment.
    Evrard JR, Gold EM, Cahill TF.
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Apr 15; 24(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 7373598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Recent trends in cesarean section use in California.
    Stafford RS.
    West J Med; 1990 Nov 15; 153(5):511-4. PubMed ID: 2260286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Good perinatal outcome in selective vaginal breech delivery at term.
    Uotila J, Tuimala R, Kirkinen P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jun 15; 84(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 15901270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.