These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [The Fieldmaster-200 computer perimeter: a comparative, controlled clinical study of its sensitivity and specificity in glaucomatous field defects (author's transl)]. Krieglstein GK, Glaab E, Gramer E. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 Nov; 179(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 7040780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis. Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry. Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E. Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pattern reversal VEP and computer perimetry of the partner eye in optic neuritis]. Lowitzsch K, Welkoborsky HJ. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1987 Dec; 18(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 3123195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Residual findings in retrobulbar neuritis during demyelinization]. Rothová Z, Jech R. Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1998 Apr; 54(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 9622948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Progression of glaucomatous visual field damage--a clinical study with the Delta program of the Octopus Perimeter 201 in assessing the effect of early damage on visual field loss in glaucoma simplex]. Gramer E, Althaus G. Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1988 Mar; 85(6):620-5. PubMed ID: 3220373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]