These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 7352491

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Routine fetal heart rate monitoring in the antepartum period.
    Schifrin BS, Foye G, Amato J, Kates R, MacKenna J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 54(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 450360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA, Lake M, Ingram JM.
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Correlation of nonstressed fetal heart rate with sequential contraction stress test.
    Gibbons JM, Nagle P.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):612-6. PubMed ID: 7366920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation: the acoustic stimulation test.
    Serafini P, Lindsay MB, Nagey DA, Pupkin MJ, Tseng P, Crenshaw C.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan 01; 148(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 6691380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J, Lambotte R.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986 Jan 01; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ.
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb 01; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. VI. Predictive reliability of "normal" tests in the prevention of antepartum death.
    Druzin ML, Gratacos J, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul 15; 137(6):746-7. PubMed ID: 7395945
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Observer variability in assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms.
    Trimbos JB, Keirse MJ.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Dec 15; 85(12):900-6. PubMed ID: 737156
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test.
    Bissonnette JM, Johnson K, Toomey C.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct 01; 135(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 484615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Antepartum testing.
    Miller DA.
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep 01; 41(3):647-53. PubMed ID: 9742361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile.
    Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Mar 15; 136(6):787-95. PubMed ID: 7355965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.