These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

124 related items for PubMed ID: 7365357

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of the conventional 12-lead and the orthogonal Frank-lead electrocardiograms in detection of myocardial infarctions with classifiers using continuous and Bernoulli features.
    Jain U, Rautaharju PM.
    J Electrocardiol; 1980 Apr; 13(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 7365357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Selection of optimal features for classification of electrocardiograms.
    Jain U, Rautaharju PM, Warren J.
    J Electrocardiol; 1981 Jul; 14(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 7264501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of multigroup logistic and linear discriminant ECG and VCG classification.
    Willems JL, Lesaffre E.
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Apr; 20(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 2955068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The performance of three visual coding procedures and three computer programs in classification of electrocardiograms according to the Minnesota Code.
    Tuinstra CL, Rautaharju PM, Prineas RJ, Duisterhout JS.
    J Electrocardiol; 1982 Oct; 15(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 6897261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Cardiac infarction injury score: an electrocardiographic coding scheme for ischemic heart disease.
    Rautaharju PM, Warren JW, Jain U, Wolf HK, Nielsen CL.
    Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 7249294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Detection of culprit coronary lesion location in pre-hospital 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE, Babaeizadeh S.
    J Electrocardiol; 2014 Aug; 47(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 25194873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the classification ability of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Willems JL, Lesaffre E, Pardaens J.
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jan 01; 59(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 2949574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Identification of first acute Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction by multivariate analysis of body surface potential maps.
    Kornreich F, Montague TJ, Rautaharju PM.
    Circulation; 1991 Dec 01; 84(6):2442-53. PubMed ID: 1835677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Detection of acute myocardial infarction using the 12-lead ECG plus inverted leads versus the 16-lead ECG (with additional posterior and right-sided chest electrodes).
    Trägårdh E, Claesson M, Wagner GS, Zhou S, Pahlm O.
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2007 Nov 01; 27(6):368-74. PubMed ID: 17944659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnostic criteria for computer-aided electrocardiographic 15-lead system. Evaluation using 12 leads and Frank orthogonal leads with vector display.
    Talbot S, Dreifus LS, Watanabe Y, Chiang R, Morris K, Reich M.
    Br Heart J; 1976 Dec 01; 38(12):1247-61. PubMed ID: 137730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative accuracy of computerized spatial vectorcardiography and standard electrocardiography for detection of myocardial infarction.
    Cowan MJ, Bruce RA, Van Winkle D, Davidson L, Killpack A.
    J Electrocardiol; 1985 Apr 01; 18(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 3998641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sensitivity for Telemed diagnosis of myocardial infarction by use of 12-lead electrocardiogram derived from Frank XYZ leads.
    Bruce RA, Belanger L, Blackmon JR, Trimble S.
    J Electrocardiol; 1982 Apr 01; 15(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 7069333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Discriminant analysis of the standard 12-lead ECG for diagnosing non-Q wave myocardial infarction.
    Kornreich F, Selvester RH, Montague TJ, Rautaharju PM, Saetre HA, Ahmad J.
    J Electrocardiol; 1992 Apr 01; 24 Suppl():163-72. PubMed ID: 1552252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Visual transform applications for estimating the spatial QRS-T angle from the conventional 12-lead ECG: Kors is still most Frank.
    Cortez D, Sharma N, Devers C, Devers E, Schlegel TT.
    J Electrocardiol; 2014 Apr 01; 47(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24099887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction.
    Otto LA, Aufderheide TP.
    Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jan 01; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8273952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Clinical significance of the corrected orthogonal ECG (Frank) in comparison with conventional ECG for the detection of coronary heart disease].
    Semmler H, Parsi RA.
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1983 Sep 01; 38(17):467-72. PubMed ID: 6636915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison between EASI system 12-lead ECGs and standard 12-lead ECGs for improved clinical nursing practice.
    Lancia L, Pisegna Cerone M, Vittorini P, Romano S, Penco M.
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Feb 01; 17(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 18205693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Map representation and diagnostic performance of the standard 12-lead ECG.
    Kornreich F, Lux RL, MacLeod RS.
    J Electrocardiol; 1995 Feb 01; 28 Suppl():121-3. PubMed ID: 8656098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A new ECG classification system for myocardial infarction based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and information theory.
    Abreu-Lima C, Correia DM, Almeida J, Antunes-Lopes M, Cerqueira-Gomes M.
    Circulation; 1983 Jun 01; 67(6):1252-7. PubMed ID: 6851019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improved detection of acute myocardial infarction using a diagnostic algorithm based on calculated epicardial potentials.
    Owens C, Navarro C, McClelland A, Riddell J, Escalona O, Anderson JM, Adgey J.
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Aug 10; 111(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 16368156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.