These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments. Hulka BS, Romm FJ, Parkerson GR, Russell IT, Clapp NE, Johnson FS. Med Care; 1979 Mar; 17(3 Suppl):i-vi, 1-73. PubMed ID: 763009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between physician time-unlimited vs time-limited internal medicine board certification and ambulatory patient care quality. Hayes J, Jackson JL, McNutt GM, Hertz BJ, Ryan JJ, Pawlikowski SA. JAMA; 2014 Dec 10; 312(22):2358-63. PubMed ID: 25490326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review? Hofer TP, Asch SM, Hayward RA, Rubenstein LV, Hogan MM, Adams J, Kerr EA. BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 May 19; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 15151701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Care process and patient outcome in diabetes mellitus. Romm FJ, Hulka BS. Med Care; 1979 Jul 19; 17(7):748-57. PubMed ID: 459577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician performance in a prepaid health plan: results of the peer review program of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York. Deuschle JM, Alvarez B, Logsdon DN, Stahl WM, Smith H. Med Care; 1982 Feb 19; 20(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 7078277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of an individualized practice-based CME program on physician performance and patient outcomes. Gullion DS, Adamson TE, Watts MS. West J Med; 1983 Apr 19; 138(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 6868584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Group versus single handed primary care: a performance evaluation of the care delivered to chronic patients by Italian GPs. Visca M, Donatini A, Gini R, Federico B, Damiani G, Francesconi P, Grilli L, Rampichini C, Lapini G, Zocchetti C, Di Stanislao F, Brambilla A, Moirano F, Bellentani D. Health Policy; 2013 Nov 19; 113(1-2):188-98. PubMed ID: 23800605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. JAMA; 2001 Jun 13; 285(22):2871-9. PubMed ID: 11401608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Case-mix differences among ambulatory patients seen by internists in various settings. Lion J. Health Serv Res; 1981 Jun 13; 16(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 6799429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Profiling care provided by different groups of physicians: effects of patient case-mix (bias) and physician-level clustering on quality assessment results. Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Kahn R, Ninomiya J, Griffith JL. Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan 15; 136(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 11790062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing criteria for quality of assessment: effect of the Delphi technique. Romm FJ, Hulka BS. Health Serv Res; 1979 Jan 15; 14(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 393660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Blood pressure control in private practice: a case report. Engelland AL, Alderman MH, Powell HB. Am J Public Health; 1979 Jan 15; 69(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 420352 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]