These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. An approach to an analysis of the energy response of LiF-TLD to high energy electrons. Shiragai A. Phys Med Biol; 1977 May; 22(3):490-9. PubMed ID: 866413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the clinical use of TLD. Rudén BI. Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1976 Oct; 15(5):447-64. PubMed ID: 827192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified general cavity theory applied to the calculation of gamma dose in 60Co thermoluminescence dosimetry. Horowitz YS, Moscovitch M, Dubi A. Phys Med Biol; 1983 Jul; 28(7):829-40. PubMed ID: 6611657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays. Davis SD, Ross CK, Mobit PN, Van der Zwan L, Chase WJ, Shortt KR. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003 Jul; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An EGS4 Monte Carlo examination of general cavity theory. Mobit PN, Nahum AE, Mayles P. Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jul; 42(7):1319-34. PubMed ID: 9253042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A general cavity theory. Haider JA, Skarsgard LD, Lam GK. Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):491-500. PubMed ID: 9080531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Energy dependence of the response of lithium fluoride TLD rods in high energy electron fields. Holt JG, Edelstein GR, Clark TE. Phys Med Biol; 1975 Jul; 20(4):559-70. PubMed ID: 1187787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. LiF dosimetric studies of cavity displacement effect and reference depths for electron beams. Fregene AO. Med Phys; 1975 Jul; 3(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 824543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ENERGY RESPONSE FACTOR of BeO DOSEMETER CHIPS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND GENERAL CAVITY THEORY STUDY. Sarigul N, Surucu M, Aydogan B. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec 31; 185(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 30806472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Cu,P thin detectors for mixed beta-gamma fields. Ginjaume M, Pérez S, Ortega X, Duch MA. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 Dec 31; 120(1-4):316-20. PubMed ID: 16644980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Nunn AA, Davis SD, Micka JA, DeWerd LA. Med Phys; 2008 May 31; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative thermoluminescence efficiency of TLD-600 and TLD-700 dosemeters irradiated with 59.8 MeV per nucleon krypton-86 ions. Mukherjee B, Ronningen RM, Cross P. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002 May 31; 100(1-4):537-9. PubMed ID: 12382938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. Mobit PN, Mayles P, Nahum AE. Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar 31; 41(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 8778821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC, Hedman A, Grindborg JE, Carlsson GA. Med Phys; 2011 Oct 31; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive study of LiF TL response to high energy photons and electrons. Bagne F. Radiology; 1977 Jun 31; 123(3):753-60. PubMed ID: 404666 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]