These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 7390727

  • 1. Stereogram design for testing local stereopsis.
    Westheimer G, McKee SP.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Jul; 19(7):802-9. PubMed ID: 7390727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A new method for assessing motion-in-depth perception in strabismic patients.
    Watanabe Y, Kezuka T, Harasawa K, Usui M, Yaguchi H, Shioiri S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 92(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17596334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Finely graded binocular disparities from random-dot stereograms.
    Reading RW, Tanlamai T.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982 Jan; 2(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 7088555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Development of stereoscopic acuity: longitudinal study using a computer-based random-dot stereo test.
    Takai Y, Sato M, Tan R, Hirai T.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 49(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15692766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of stereopsis.
    Westheimer G.
    Vision Res; 2013 Sep 20; 90():38-42. PubMed ID: 23092634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?
    Westheimer G, McKee SP.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Jun 20; 18(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 447460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues.
    Harwerth RS, Moeller MC, Wensveen JM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun 20; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The development of stereoscopic vision in the first months of life].
    Reim M, Teping C, Silny J.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1989 Jun 20; 12(10):623-7. PubMed ID: 2638356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stereopsis testing without polarized glasses: a comparison study on five new stereoacuity tests.
    Hatch SW, Richman JE.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Sep 20; 65(9):637-41. PubMed ID: 7963223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Critical immaturities limiting infant binocular stereopsis.
    Brown AM, Lindsey DT, Satgunam P, Miracle JA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar 20; 48(3):1424-34. PubMed ID: 17325192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Stereo dynamics are not scale-dependent.
    Hess RF, Wilcox LM.
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun 20; 46(12):1911-23. PubMed ID: 16469355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S, Bedell HE.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan 20; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A clinical evaluation of random dot stereoacuity cards in infants.
    Calloway SL, Lloyd IC, Henson DB.
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct 20; 15(Pt 5):629-34. PubMed ID: 11702975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Local and global stereopsis in the horse.
    Timney B, Keil K.
    Vision Res; 1999 May 20; 39(10):1861-7. PubMed ID: 10343877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.