These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


376 related items for PubMed ID: 7393517

  • 1. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare.
    O'Leary JA, Mendenhall HW, Andrinopoulos GC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W, Greene J, Donaldson M.
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW, Horger EO, Vice L.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ, Cetrulo CL, Knuppel RA, Kappy KA, Scerbo JC, Lake M, Aumann G.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The nonstress test. A preliminary report of a graded classification.
    O'Leary JA, Mendenhall HW, Andrinopoulos GC.
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 7452634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA, Lake M, Ingram JM.
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Correlation of nonstressed fetal heart rate with sequential contraction stress test.
    Gibbons JM, Nagle P.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):612-6. PubMed ID: 7366920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ.
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Simplified antepartum fetal heart assessment.
    Baskett TF, Boyce CD, Lohre MA, Manning FA.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 88(4):395-7. PubMed ID: 7225298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM, Rabello Y, Medearis AL, Paul RH.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reliability of antenatal testing: estriol levels versus nonstress testing.
    Lauersen NH, Kurkulos M, Graves ZR, Lewin K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6856212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nonstress test: dimensions of normal reactivity.
    Devoe LD, McKenzie J, Searle N, Sherline DM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):617-20. PubMed ID: 4058819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The relation between fetal heart rate accelerations and fetal movements.
    Rabinowitz R, Persitz E, Sadovsky E.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 6823344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Auscultated fetal heart rate accelerations. An alternative to the nonstress test.
    Daniels SM, Boehm N.
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1991 Jan; 36(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 2037878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Changes in and characteristics of the monitoring of the reactivity and variability of the heart rate of the premature fetus during a non stress test (NST)].
    Ivanov S, Georgiev R.
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1983 Jan; 22(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 6638376
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.