These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
275 related items for PubMed ID: 7431981
1. Clinical durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthetic valve. Oyer PE, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Reitz BA, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Shumway NE. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Dec; 80(6):824-33. PubMed ID: 7431981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion. Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A. J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses. Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE. Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén PS. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis. Borger MA, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Christie-Hrybinsky D, Feindel CM, David TE. J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):49-55; discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 16480012 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis. Mykén P, Bech-Hanssen O, Phipps B, Caidahl K. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients. Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G, Guerra F, Mazzucco A, Valente M, Talenti E, Gallucci V. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW, Canver CC, Sallehuddin A, Al-Oufi S, Joufan M, Al-Halees Z. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years). Gallo I, Ruiz B, Duran CM. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M, Kulik A, Rubens FD, Bédard P, Masters RG, Pipe AL, Mesana TG. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions. Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Pomar J. Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a 7-year follow-up in 361 patients. Zussa C, Del Ponte S, Ottino GM, Pansini S, Zattera G, Morea M. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 2429394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis: a 25-year experience with single valve replacement. Emery RW, Krogh CC, Arom KV, Emery AM, Benyo-Albrecht K, Joyce LD, Nicoloff DM. Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 79(3):776-82; discussion 782-3. PubMed ID: 15734375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]