These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


627 related items for PubMed ID: 7439010

  • 1. Smear biopsies: a cause of negative follow-up biopsies in patients with premalignant conditions of the uterine cervix.
    Berner A, Høeg K, Oppedal BR.
    Diagn Gynecol Obstet; 1980; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 7439010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Cytological findings of precancerous lesion and early cancer in the uterine cervix (author's transl)].
    Kurihara S.
    Rinsho Byori; 1976; 24(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 988262
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
    Parker A, Ueki M.
    N Z Med J; 1986 Jun 11; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Jun 11; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Conization for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: long term follow-up of 1013 women.
    Larsson G.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1981 Jun 11; 70(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 7316444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
    McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL, Ling FW.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May 11; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of the abnormal Pap smear.
    Homesley HD.
    Am Fam Physician; 1977 Sep 11; 16(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 900003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of Papanicolaou smear and effect of sample biopsy in follow-up of cervical dysplasia.
    Youkeles L, Forsythe AB, Stern E.
    Cancer Res; 1976 Jun 11; 36(6):2080-4. PubMed ID: 1268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW, Smith NL, Dike LS.
    Acta Cytol; 1981 Jun 11; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP, Kaminsky DB, Ekbladh LE.
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec 11; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Diagnosis of stage Ia cervix cancer].
    Schumacher A, Schwarz R.
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989 Dec 11; 111(5):310-6. PubMed ID: 2728674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.