These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
305 related items for PubMed ID: 7465117
21. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal. Martin D, Umpierre SA, Villamarzo G, Sánchez O, Sánchez J, Carrodeguas J, Adamsons K. P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Colposcopy and cryosurgery in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Tredway DR, Townsend DE, Hovland DN, Upton RT. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Dec 15; 114(8):1020-4. PubMed ID: 4635196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush. Partoll LM, Javaheri G. Acta Cytol; 1993 Dec 15; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Intraepithelial cervical lesions: colpo-microcolposcopic diagnosis]. Pace S, Labi GL, Figliolini M, Stentella P, De Falco V, Mastrone M, Villani C, Lotti G. Minerva Ginecol; 1993 Dec 15; 45(1-2):9-11. PubMed ID: 8469368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Jobson VW. Am Fam Physician; 1981 Aug 15; 24(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 7258081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy. Massad LS, Lonky NM, Mutch DG, Mann WJ, Blanco JS, Vasilev SA, Finan MA, Scotti RJ. J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar 15; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Can colposcopy replace conization? Townsend DE, Richart RM. CA Cancer J Clin; 1982 Mar 15; 32(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 6800593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population. Chin AB, Bristow RE, Korst LM, Walts A, Lagasse LD. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun 15; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report. Luesley D, Downey G. J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan 15; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the abnormal PAP smear - colposcopy or conization? Powell JL. J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 May 15; 69(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 7373179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Colposcopy and electrocoagulation-diathermy for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Chansen W, Hollyock VE. Obstet Gynecol; 1971 Apr 15; 37(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 5547861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os]. Rooker D, Baalbergen A, Helmerhorst TJ. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr 26; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy without endocervical curettage. Swan RW. Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jun 26; 53(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 450334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Cytologic correlation between the Bethesda system and colposcopic biopsy]. González Sánchez JL, Pérez Guerrero C, Celorio Aguilera G, Chávez Barambila J, Ríos Montiel FA. Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Aug 26; 66():330-4. PubMed ID: 9745194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The making of a colposcopist. A safe and sensible approach. Feldman MJ, Kent DR, Linzey EM, Goldstein AI. J Reprod Med; 1976 Feb 26; 16(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 1255646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]