These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation. Granai CO, Jelen I, Louis F, Kawada CY, Curry SL. J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram: sensitivity, specificity, and cost analysis. Tawa K, Forsythe A, Cove JK, Saltz A, Peters HW, Watring WG. Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 3336558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Speculoscopy vs. the acetic acid test for cervical neoplasia. Cronjé HS, van Rensburg E, Cooreman BF, Niemand I, Beyer E. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Jun; 69(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 10854867 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A critical evaluation of the endocervical curettage. Spirtos NM, Schlaerth JB, d'Ablaing G, Morrow CP. Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):729-33. PubMed ID: 3658281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]