These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
104 related items for PubMed ID: 7474579
1. [The long-term results of isolated aortic valve replacement with 19 mm prostheses]. Nakamura T, Shimamoto M, Yamazaki F, Yoshimura T, Itoi S, Ueno T, Oyanagi H, Nakai M, Shinozaki T. Kyobu Geka; 1995 Sep; 48(10):824-8. PubMed ID: 7474579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G, Di Segni M, Boccardi L, Ferrari O, Giovannini E. G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis. Mullany CJ, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, Miller FA. J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de O, da C, Vrandecic E. J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions. Iwahashi K, Ota T, Okada M, Tsukube T, Matsuda H. Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of different pressure gradients on late clinical outcome after aortic valve replacement. Hoffmann A, Haefeli R, Weiss P, Stultz P, Peter M, Gradel E, Burckhardt D. J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1341223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Avoidance of patient-prosthesis mismatch]. Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto K. Kyobu Geka; 2006 Apr; 59(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 16613142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. Kleine P, Hasenkam MJ, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The evaluation of pressure gradients of various aortic valve prostheses by Doppler ultrasound and influence of pressure gradients to left ventricular function]. Aoki A. Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 37(4):676-87. PubMed ID: 2671194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root. Walther T, Falk V, Diegeler A, Autschbach R, Gummert J, Baryalei M, Mohr FW. J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. Murphy DA, Levine FH, Buckley MJ, Swinski L, Daggett WM, Akins CW, Austen WG. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, Kass RM, Sandhu M, Czer LS, Blanche C, Raissi S, Fontana GP, Cheng W, Chaux A, Matloff JM. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Hemodynamic assessment of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve compared with the St. Jude Medical valve in the aortic position using dobutamine-stress echocardiography]. Oda T, Fukunaga S, Arinaga K, Kawano H, Chihara S, Yokose S, Onitsuka S, Sakashita H, Aoyagi S. Kyobu Geka; 2000 Apr; 53(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10770062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]