These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

164 related items for PubMed ID: 7486241

  • 1. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS, Nieberg L, Cisneros GJ, Acs G.
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH, Cooke MS.
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL, Glover KE.
    Angle Orthod; 1994 Feb; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C, Sindet-Pedersen S.
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reproducibility of cephalometric measurements made by three radiology clinics.
    da Silveira HL, Silveira HE.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):394-9. PubMed ID: 16637717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, Chang HF.
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
    Borrie F, Thomson D, McIntyre GT.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Radiation reduction using a modified collimated lateral skull radiograph during orthodontic treatment.
    Mandall NA, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV.
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Nov; 2(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 10806941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Cephalometry and digital radiography. Technical note].
    Scutellari PN, Orzincolo C, Verna C, Vincenzi E, Lucci R, Vita F.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8296014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.