These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


199 related items for PubMed ID: 7487327

  • 1. [Influence of the valve position on the complications related to pericardial Carpentier-Edwards valve after 8 years].
    Aupart M, Dreyfus X, Meurisse Y, May MA, Sirinelli A, Marchand M.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Jul; 88(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 7487327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T, Eishi K, Nakano S, Kobayashi J, Sasako Y, Isobe F, Kosakai Y, Kito Y, Kawashima Y.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
    Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Janusz MT, Chaitman BR, Tyers FO, Miyagishima RT.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
    Legarra JJ, Llorens R, Catalan M, Segura I, Trenor AM, de Buruaga JS, Rabago G, Sarralde A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
    Jamieson WR, Miyagishima RT, Burr LH, Lichtenstein SV, Fradet GJ, Janusz MT.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a 7-year follow-up in 361 patients.
    Zussa C, Del Ponte S, Ottino GM, Pansini S, Zattera G, Morea M.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 2429394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Late results with Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
    Akins CW, Carroll DL, Buckley MJ, Daggett WM, Hilgenberg AD, Austen WG.
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV65-74. PubMed ID: 2225437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
    Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Pomar J.
    Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses.
    Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, Germann E, Anderson WN.
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years).
    Gallo I, Ruiz B, Duran CM.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: 10-year results.
    Aupart MR, Babuty DG, Guesnier L, Meurisse YA, Sirinelli AL, Marchand MA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 8793683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: investigational center experience to six years.
    Jamieson WR, Fradet GJ, MacNab JS, Burr LH, Stanford EA, Janusz MT, Abel JG, Germann E, Cheung A.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15700437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
    Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis in patients under 60 years of age. Experience over 10 years].
    Aupart M, Hammami S, Sirinelli A, Dreyfus X, Meurisse Y, Marchand M.
    Ann Chir; 1996 Mar; 50(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 8761106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Ultracor tilting disc heart valve prosthesis: a seven-year study.
    Li HH, Jeffrey RR, Davidson KG, Seifert D, Körfer R, Grunkemeier GL.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Nov; 7(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 9870199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.