These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

522 related items for PubMed ID: 7491097

  • 1. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H, Rothman DJ.
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Remodelling IRBs.
    Silberner J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(4):5. PubMed ID: 9762532
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Toward a more comprehensive approach to protecting human subjects: the interface of data safety monitoring boards and institutional review boards in randomized clinical trials.
    Gordon VM, Sugarman J, Kass N.
    IRB; 1998; 20(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11655324
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Do we need another advisory commission on human experimentation?
    Katz J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995 Jan; 25(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 7730048
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
    Addicott DC.
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999 Jan; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
    Levine C, Caplan AL.
    IRB; 1986 Jan; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
    Michels R.
    N Engl J Med; 1999 May 06; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Fetal research: the state of the question.
    Fletcher JC, Schulman JD.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr 06; 15(2):6-12. PubMed ID: 4008241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Institutional review boards. A net too thin.
    Palca J.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996 Apr 06; 26(3):4. PubMed ID: 8736666
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. FDA seeks tighter controls over research with human subjects.
    Hershey N, Miller RD.
    Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Dec 06; 7(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 10239337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
    Katz J.
    IRB; 1987 Dec 06; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
    Martensen R.
    Med Humanit Rev; 1997 Dec 06; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS.
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov 06; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Half-full or half-empty? Evaluating IRB performance.
    Mishkin B, Ariand N.
    Prof Ethics Rep; 1998 Nov 06; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11657925
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The human radiation experiments: the real issues.
    Mossman KL.
    Health Phys; 1995 Jun 06; 68(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 7759252
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.