These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Acceptance test of film processing in roentgen diagnosis]. Hoeschen D, Buhr E. Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Jul; 6(4):203-5. PubMed ID: 8924456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations]. Trier HG. Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality assurance in diagnostic radiography: are we using it correctly and what is its future? Thornhill PJ. Radiography; 1987 Oct; 53(610):161-3. PubMed ID: 3671699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [The reduction of the genetically significant dose in the Federal Republic of Germany as a consequence of expert examinations on medical x-ray equipments (author's transl)]. Ewen K, Sprenger D. Rofo; 1981 Sep; 135(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 6212341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Medicine and Medical Devices Safety Authority in evaluating complementary and alternative medicines in Australia and New Zealand. Ghosh D, Skinner M, Ferguson LR. Toxicology; 2006 Apr 03; 221(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 16481089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Reuse of "single use" medical devices after quality assured reprocessing: hygienic, legal and economic aspects. Potential for cost savings in interventional cardiology]. Ischinger TA, Neubauer G, Ujlaky R, Schätzl H, Bock M. Z Kardiol; 2002 Nov 03; 91(11):889-98. PubMed ID: 12442191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A compliance testing program for diagnostic X-ray equipment. Hutchinson DE, Cobb BJ, Jacob CS. Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan 03; 50(1):237-45. PubMed ID: 10028640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Changed guidelines by the federal medical office regarding quality dismissed. Caution in purchasing new enhancement screens]. Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul 03; 5(4):274-5. PubMed ID: 7548259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Medical device regulation in the United States and the European Union: a comparative study. Chai JY. Food Drug Law J; 2000 Jul 03; 55(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 12296349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Control of x-ray equipment for quality assurance (constancy testing)]. Lang G. Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jul 03; 41(7):240-4. PubMed ID: 3413583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. French homologation for medical devices: past and future. Rader J. Med Device Technol; 1993 Apr 03; 4(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 10171652 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA. Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 03; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]