These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 7500617

  • 1. Comparison between GC-MS and the EMIT II, Abbott ADx, and Roche OnLine immunoassays for the determination of THCCOOH.
    Kintz P, Machart D, Jamey C, Mangin P.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1995 Sep; 19(5):304-6. PubMed ID: 7500617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Investigation of nitrite adulteration on the immunoassay and GC-MS analysis of cannabinoids in urine specimens.
    Tsai LS, ElSohly MA, Tsai SF, Murphy TP, Twarowska B, Salamone SJ.
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Sep; 24(8):708-14. PubMed ID: 11110026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hemp oil ingestion causes positive urine tests for delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol carboxylic acid.
    Costantino A, Schwartz RH, Kaplan P.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997 Oct; 21(6):482-5. PubMed ID: 9323529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Correlations on radioimmunoassay, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and enzyme immunoassay of cannabis metabolites with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of 11-nor-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-9-carboxylic acid in urine specimens.
    Weaver ML, Gan BK, Allen E, Baugh LD, Liao FY, Liu RH, Langner JG, Walia AS, Cook LF.
    Forensic Sci Int; 1991 Oct; 49(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 1851715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of the Abbott ADx Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II abused drug assay: comparison to TDx, EMIT, and GC/MS methods.
    Przekop MA, Manno JE, Kunsman GW, Cockerham KR, Manno BR.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1991 Oct; 15(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 1779660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Determination of five abused drugs in nitrite-adulterated urine by immunoassays and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
    Tsai SC, ElSohly MA, Dubrovsky T, Twarowska B, Towt J, Salamone SJ.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1998 Oct; 22(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 9788522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay, enzyme immunoassay, and thin-layer chromatography for urine cannabinoid screening. Effects of analyte adsorption and vigorous mixing of specimen on detectability.
    Dextraze P, Griffiths WC, Camara P, Audette L, Rosner M.
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1989 Oct; 19(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 2546480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Enzyme immunoassay, kinetic microparticle immunoassay, radioimmunoassay, and fluorescence polarization immunoassay compared for drugs-of-abuse screening.
    Armbruster DA, Schwarzhoff RH, Hubster EC, Liserio MK.
    Clin Chem; 1993 Oct; 39(10):2137-46. PubMed ID: 8403399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. New fluorescence polarization immunoassays for analysis of barbiturates and benzodiazepines in serum and urine: performance characteristics.
    Schwenzer KS, Pearlman R, Tsilimidos M, Salamone SJ, Cannon RC, Wong SH, Gock SB, Jentzen JJ.
    J Anal Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 24(8):726-32. PubMed ID: 11110029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Detecting benzodiazepines: immunoassays compared with negative chemical ionization gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
    Fitzgerald RL, Rexin DA, Herold DA.
    Clin Chem; 1994 Mar; 40(3):373-80. PubMed ID: 8131270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The online screening technique for urinary benzodiazepines: comparison with EMIT, FPIA, and GC-MS.
    Beck O, Lin Z, Brodin K, Borg S, Hjemdahl P.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1997 Mar; 21(7):554-7. PubMed ID: 9399125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Papain adulteration in 11-nor-Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol- 9-carboxylic acid-positive urine samples.
    Larson SJ, Holler JM, Magluilo J, Dunkley CS, Jacobs A.
    J Anal Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 32(6):438-43. PubMed ID: 18652751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of methaqualone excretion patterns using Abuscreen ONLINE and EMIT II immunoassays and GC/MS.
    Brenner C, Hui R, Passarelli J, Wu R, Brenneisen R, Bracher K, ElSohly MA, Ghodoussi VD, Salamone SJ.
    Forensic Sci Int; 1996 May 17; 79(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 8635771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of the online immunoassay for propoxyphene: comparison to EMIT II and GC-MS.
    McNally AJ, Pilcher I, Wu R, Salamone SJ, Brewington S, King JW, Irving J.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1996 May 17; 20(7):537-40. PubMed ID: 8934302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Drug screening and confirmation by GC-MS: comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories.
    Lu NT, Taylor BG.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Mar 10; 157(2-3):106-16. PubMed ID: 15899564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.