These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 7540324

  • 1. Comparison of porcine biological valves with pericardial valves--a 12-year clinical experience with 1123 bio-prostheses.
    Reichenspurner H, Weinhold C, Nollert G, Kaulbach HG, Vetter HO, Boehm DH, Reichart B.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Feb; 43(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7540324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
    Goldman B, Scully H, Tong C, Mandell R, Butany J, Azuma J, Schwartz L.
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH, Moran JM, Michaelis LL.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov 21; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
    Hammond GL, Geha AS, Kopf GS, Hashim SW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb 21; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
    Joyce LD, Nelson RM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul 21; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL, Marvasti MA, Potts JL, Reger MJ, Zamora JL, Eich RH, Parker FB.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov 21; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
    Chaudhry MA, Raco L, Muriithi EW, Bernacca GM, Tolland MM, Wheatley DJ.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May 21; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance.
    Jamieson WR, Allen P, Miyagishima RT, Gerein AN, Munro AI, Burr LH, Tyers GF.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar 21; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Middle term follow-up and comparative study of valve replacement with four kinds of new model bovine pericardial xenografts].
    Tajima K, Kawazoe K, Fujii N, Kito Y, Ohara K, Kosakai Y, Takeuchi S, Fujita T.
    Kyobu Geka; 1990 Jun 21; 43(6):438-43. PubMed ID: 2385015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
    Teoh KH, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Darcel IC, Rakowski H.
    Circulation; 1989 Sep 21; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Use of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of a patient selection policy.
    Louagie Y, Noirhomme P, Aranguis E, Eucher P, Vanruyssevelt P, Buche M, Dion R, Jaumin P, Schoevaerdts JC, Chalant CH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Oct 21; 104(4):1013-24. PubMed ID: 1405658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.