These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
137 related items for PubMed ID: 7540324
21. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. Bortolotti U, Milano A, Thiene G, Guerra F, Mazzucco A, Valente M, Talenti E, Gallucci V. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [The Carpentier-Edwards porcine valve in the supra annular aortic position. Results after 12 years in a series of 1108 patients]. Logeais Y, Leguerrier A, Rioux C, Chaperon J, Lelong B, Langanay T, Delambre JF, el Issa A, Valla J. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1997 Jun; 90(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 9295930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Randomized, prospective assessment of bioprosthetic valve durability. Hancock versus Carpentier-Edwards valves. Sarris GE, Robbins RC, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Moore KA, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Shumway NE. Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II55-64. PubMed ID: 8222197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients. Aupart MR, Sirinelli AL, Diemont FF, Meurisse YA, Dreyfus XB, Marchand MA. Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Feb; 61(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 8572776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Ten year durability and performance of porcine bioprostheses. Miller DC, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Z Kardiol; 1985 Feb; 74 Suppl 6():15-8. PubMed ID: 4096073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Twelve-year experience with the 19 mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve. Nakajima H, Aupart MR, Neville PH, Sirinelli AL, Meurisse YA, Marchand MA. J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):534-9. PubMed ID: 9793853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Lack of durability of the Mitroflow valve does not affect survival. Houel R, Le Besnerais P, Soustelle C, Kirsch M, Hillion ML, Loisance D. J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jul; 8(4):368-74; discussion 374-5. PubMed ID: 10461235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. Khan SS, Trento A, DeRobertis M, Kass RM, Sandhu M, Czer LS, Blanche C, Raissi S, Fontana GP, Cheng W, Chaux A, Matloff JM. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H, Rudolph W. Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, Janusz MT, Miyagishima RT, Munro AI, Ling H, Burr LH, Tutassaura H. Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]