These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


144 related items for PubMed ID: 7549318

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Vital changes in corneal structure after LASEK during the early postoperative period].
    Rokita-Wala I, Gierek-Ciaciura S, Mrukwa-Kominek E, Obidziński M.
    Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12046302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of corneal wound healing of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits].
    Ma XH, Li JH, Bi HS, Zhou F, Li Y.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 39(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 12880569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Keratomileusis in situ in high grade myopia. Initial results].
    Wiegand W, Krusenberg B, Kroll P.
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Aug; 92(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 7549319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of in vivo confocal microscopy of human cornea by white light scanning slit and laser scanning systems.
    Szaflik JP.
    Cornea; 2007 May; 26(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 17457193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Corneal recovery after lasik for high myopia: a 2-year prospective confocal microscopic study.
    Moilanen JA, Holopainen JM, Vesaluoma MH, Tervo TM.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Oct; 92(10):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18650214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Role of keratocyte loss on corneal wound repair after LASIK.
    Ivarsen A, Laurberg T, Møller-Pedersen T.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3499-506. PubMed ID: 15452055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Tandem scanning confocal microscopy of cornea after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Prasher P, Muftuoglu O, Bowman RW, McCulley JP, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Mootha VV.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 19502987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Confocal microscopic characterization of wound repair after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Møller-Pedersen T, Li HF, Petroll WM, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Mar; 39(3):487-501. PubMed ID: 9501858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vivo laser confocal microscopy after non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
    Kobayashi A, Yokogawa H, Sugiyama K.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1306-13. PubMed ID: 19576498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. One-year follow-up of corneal confocal microscopy after corneal cross-linking in patients with post laser in situ keratosmileusis ectasia and keratoconus.
    Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, Kalyvianaki M, Portaliou D, Siganos C, Kozobolis VP, Pallikaris AI.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 147(5):774-8, 778.e1. PubMed ID: 19200532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Iron deposits in cornea in confocal microscope].
    Rokita-Wala I, Gierek-Ciaciura S, Majlinger R, Wygledowska-Promieńska D.
    Klin Oczna; 2001 May; 103(2-3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11873408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A longitudinal case series investigating cellular changes to the transplanted cornea using confocal microscopy.
    Hollingsworth JG, Efron N, Tullo AB.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Jul; 29(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 16730217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.