These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

203 related items for PubMed ID: 7552128

  • 21. Bariatric surgery costs and implications for hospital margins: comparing laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric banding.
    Frezza EE, Wachtel MS, Ewing BT.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Aug; 17(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 17710042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Reusable laparoscopic instrument systems: an analysis of quality and cost issues.
    Weatherly KS, Young SW.
    J Laparoendosc Surg; 1994 Apr; 4(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 8043922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Reusable, re-posable and disposable instrumentation.
    Melzer A, Buess G.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Apr; 3(2-3):127-8. PubMed ID: 7552127
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S, Srisuphan W, Plianpadung S, Senaratana W.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P, Senarat W, Tribuddharat C, Danchaivijitr S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Traverso LW, Hargrave K.
    Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 7747829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J, Hill AG, MacCormick AD.
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Laparoscopic instruments good outsourcing candidates.
    Whittington S, Vasey N.
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1997 Jun; 22(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 10173016
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
    Engert K.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Jun; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Reusables may slow rising tide of laparoscopic surgery costs.
    Souhrada L.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Feb; 2(2):22. PubMed ID: 10171424
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Reuse of single-use medical devices.
    Fielder JH.
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1999 Feb; 18(6):80-1. PubMed ID: 10576078
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Costs and benefits of laparoscopic surgery--a review of the literature.
    Jönsson B, Zethraeus N.
    Eur J Surg Suppl; 2000 Feb; (585):48-56. PubMed ID: 10885558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.