These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 7561591

  • 1. Guidelines for the choice of disposable and reusable medical equipment. The Hospital Infection Control Group of Thailand.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 2():S132. PubMed ID: 7561591
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S, Srisuphan W, Plianpadung S, Senaratana W.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.
    Nanta P, Senarat W, Tribuddharat C, Danchaivijitr S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Dec; 88 Suppl 10():S86-8. PubMed ID: 16850647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparing the cost of reusable and disposable packs.
    MacLean C.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1994 Feb; 3(2):24-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10131599
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation.
    Bessell JR, Patkin M, Isabel L.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Risky recycling: that "disposable" catheter may have been used before.
    Hawkins D.
    US News World Rep; 1999 Sep 20; 127(11):62-4, 66-7. PubMed ID: 10621509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Advantages of reusable accessories.
    Wolfsen HC.
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr 20; 10(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 10683220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Re-using 'single-use' medical devices.
    Dunn JP.
    N Z Med J; 2000 Oct 27; 113(1120):452. PubMed ID: 11194773
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective.
    Straface S.
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Oct 27; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Re-sterilization of disposable products: a gamble].
    Haindl H.
    Pflege Z; 2002 Feb 27; 55(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 12640997
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
    Engert K.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Feb 27; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Should disposable products be reused? The "re-user" takes big risks].
    Liedström G.
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan 03; 93(1-2):41-2. PubMed ID: 8544531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cutting costs or cutting corners? Cardiac cath reuse.
    Wilson D.
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1997 May 03; 6(5):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10167493
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reuse of disposables. Reprocessing issues taking users down 'slippery slope'.
    OR Manager; 1996 Jun 03; 12(6):1, 7. PubMed ID: 10157849
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Medical device reprocessing: research and practice.
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997 Jun 03; 31(3):221-2. PubMed ID: 9181239
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories.
    Petersen BT.
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2000 Apr 03; 10(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 10683219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.