These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 7564433

  • 1. Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results.
    Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, Taeymans Y, Van Belleghem Y, François K, De Bacquer D, Deuvaert FE, Wellens F, Primo G.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 7564433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience.
    Van Nooten GJ, Caes FL, François KJ, Taeymans Y, Primo G, Wellens F, Leclerq JL, Deuvaert FE.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995 Sep; 9(8):441-6; discussion 446-7. PubMed ID: 7495588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.
    Scully HE, Armstrong CS.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 109(6):1035-41. PubMed ID: 7776666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term survival after tricuspid valve replacement. Results with seven different prostheses.
    Jugdutt BI, Fraser RS, Lee SJ, Rossall RE, Callaghan JC.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Jul; 74(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 141548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Tricuspid valve replacement: porcine bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses.
    Munro AI, Jamieson WR, Tyers GF, Germann E.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Aug; 60(2 Suppl):S470-3; discussion S473-4. PubMed ID: 7646210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Simultaneous implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses.
    Armenti F, Stephenson LW, Edmunds LH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Nov; 94(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 3669701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
    Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Leung Y, Ohri SK, Haw MP, Ross JK, Livesey SA, Monro JL.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Is a bioprosthesis preferable in tricuspid valve replacement?
    Hayashi J, Saito A, Yamamoto K, Watanabe H, Ohzeki H, Eguchi S.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Oct; 44(5):230-3. PubMed ID: 8948549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
    Guerra F, Bortolotti U, Thiene G, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Talenti E, Stellin G, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve prosthesis. A 5 year experience.
    Chaux A, Czer LS, Matloff JM, DeRobertis MA, Stewart ME, Bateman TM, Kass RM, Lee ME, Gray RJ.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):706-17. PubMed ID: 6492839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Magni A, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
    McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Cohn LH.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC.
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb 28; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
    Kawachi Y, Tanaka J, Tominaga R, Kinoshita K, Tokunaga K.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul 28; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era.
    Filsoufi F, Anyanwu AC, Salzberg SP, Frankel T, Cohn LH, Adams DH.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep 28; 80(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 16122441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses.
    Garatti A, Nano G, Bruschi G, Canziani A, Colombo T, Frigiola A, Martinelli L, Menicanti L.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr 28; 93(4):1146-53. PubMed ID: 22342993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
    Redondo Palacios A, López Menéndez J, Miguelena Hycka J, Martín García M, Varela Barca L, Ferreiro Marzal A, Muñoz Pérez R, Oliva de Anquín E, García Andrade I, Centella Hernández T, Celemín Canorea D, Rodríguez-Roda Stuart J.
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct 28; 58(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 27636399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.
    Florath I, Albert A, Rosendahl U, Alexander T, Ennker IC, Ennker J.
    Heart; 2005 Aug 28; 91(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 16020589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.